Why AI Agent Teams Outperform Single Super Agents
Learn why companies fail with super agents and how AI agent teams deliver true ROI by automating workflows efficiently.
A new wave of agentic AI adoption is sweeping industries, but nearly half of deployments are expected to fail due to poor ROI, according to Gartner. The key to success? Moving beyond the flawed "super agent" approach.
The Problem with Super Agents
Many companies aim to build single AI agents capable of handling entire jobs—a strategy that often backfires. Instead, experts recommend:
- Focusing on small, task-specific agents (e.g., form-filling, data extraction)
- Creating agent teams where specialized AI handles discrete workflow steps
- Example: AIG uses 80 specialized agents per underwriting project
"Giving one agent too many tasks creates a black box... transparency and quality control disappear."
Beyond the Chatbot Trap
While LLM-powered chatbots revolutionized customer service, agentic AI demands a different paradigm:
- Agents should autonomously collaborate, reducing human micromanagement
- Chat interfaces can limit potential for true workflow automation
- Human teams should focus on creative work and decision-making
Rethinking ROI
Traditional efficiency metrics miss agentic AI's transformative potential:
- Insurers cut underwriting from weeks to hours, accelerating new business
- Pharma companies streamline R&D and product launches
- True value comes from business growth acceleration, not just labor savings
Organizations succeeding with agentic AI treat it as a collaborative team augmentation tool rather than a human replacement strategy. As the article concludes: "Look not just for a return on investment but a leap forward."
Related News
Jagged AI Already Disrupting Jobs Despite AGI Remaining Distant
Enterprise AI adoption focuses on real-world returns with 'jagged' systems, driving productivity gains but leading to white-collar job cuts across industries.
Balancing AI and Human Workflows for Secure Automation
Learn how leading security teams blend AI and human workflows to avoid fragility and compliance issues in this Tines webinar.
About the Author
Dr. Lisa Kim
AI Ethics Researcher
Leading expert in AI ethics and responsible AI development with 13 years of research experience. Former member of Microsoft AI Ethics Committee, now provides consulting for multiple international AI governance organizations. Regularly contributes AI ethics articles to top-tier journals like Nature and Science.