WASM and Pyodide Enable Browser-Based AI Agents for Local Code Execution
Exploring WASM and Pyodide for running AI-generated code locally in the browser, with isolation via containers, to avoid direct execution on dev machines and simplify dependency management.
Developers are leveraging WebAssembly (WASM) and Pyodide to run AI-generated code locally in the browser, avoiding the risks of direct execution on development machines. This approach provides isolation and simplifies dependency management for multi-step tasks like video editing (via ffmpeg) or graph generation (using JS + Chromium).
Key Developments
- CodeRunner: A solution built on Apple Containers (GitHub) that executes LLM-generated code in isolated containers with VM-level security.
- Gemini-CLI Integration: Unlike standalone Gemini-CLI, CodeRunner runs generated code in containers, installing dependencies before execution, making it compatible with various LLMs.
- Browser-Based Agents: WASM enables sandboxed AI agents to interact with local LLMs through the browser, potentially becoming a standard as OSes integrate local models.
Technical Considerations
- Isolation: Apple Containers provide lightweight VM-level isolation for safer code execution.
- Dependency Management: Automatically handles library installations before code execution.
- Cross-Platform: Works with remote or local LLMs, including Ollama and OpenAI-compatible APIs.
Community Perspectives
- Some question the need for WASM over plain JavaScript for LLM communication.
- Others highlight Firefox's extensibility as potentially better suited for agent development.
- Concerns raised about the "agent" terminology being overused for basic AI functionality.
Future Implications
This represents an evolution of web capabilities beyond traditional pages, with browsers potentially becoming platforms for long-running, intelligent processes. However, challenges remain in areas like:
- Observability
- Multi-channel support
- User experience
- Environmental impact of widespread local AI execution
The approach offers privacy advantages over cloud-based agents while addressing dependency complexity - a significant hurdle in AI-assisted development workflows.
Related News
Data Scientists Embrace AI Agents to Automate Workflows in 2025
How data scientists are leveraging AI agents to streamline A/B testing and analysis, reducing manual effort and improving efficiency.
Agentic AI vs AI Agents Key Differences and Future Trends
Explore the distinctions between Agentic AI and AI agents, their advantages, disadvantages, and the future of multi-agent systems.
About the Author

Alex Thompson
AI Technology Editor
Senior technology editor specializing in AI and machine learning content creation for 8 years. Former technical editor at AI Magazine, now provides technical documentation and content strategy services for multiple AI companies. Excels at transforming complex AI technical concepts into accessible content.