Agent Newsletter
Get Agentic Newsletter Today
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates
A practical guide to building your first autonomous AI agent workflow. We provide hands-on tutorials for both CrewAI and AutoGen, a detailed comparison, and code examples.
Reading time
6 min
2025/06/25
You've understood the theory of Agentic AI. You know that the future belongs to autonomous "AI teams." Now, it's time to roll up your sleeves, open your code editor, and bring one of these teams to life.
This is a hands-on, practical guide. We will walk you through building two simple but powerful multi-agent workflows using today's most popular open-source frameworks: CrewAI and AutoGen. We'll focus on code and results, so that by the end, you won't just know their differences—you'll have felt them.
This is a practical tutorial. If you need to refresh your understanding of the core concepts behind multi-agent systems, we recommend starting with our Deep Dive into Agentic AI Pillar Page.
Before we dive in, let's make sure your workshop is ready.
pip install crewai pyautogen
pip install 'crewai[tools]'
CrewAI excels at creating agents that work like a structured, efficient assembly line. Each agent has a specific role and performs a set task in a predefined order. It’s perfect for processes you already know how to solve and want to automate.
Let's build a crew to research AI trends and write a report.
First, we define our two specialists: a Researcher and a Writer.
(Code Snippet: Defining CrewAI Agents)
from crewai import Agent
from crewai_tools import SerperDevTool
# Initialize the search tool
search_tool = SerperDevTool()
# Define the Researcher Agent
researcher = Agent(
role='Senior Market Researcher',
goal='Uncover groundbreaking technologies and trends in AI agentics',
backstory="""You are an expert market researcher at a top tech think tank.
Your mastery lies in identifying emerging trends and technologies.""",
verbose=True,
allow_delegation=False,
tools=[search_tool]
)
# Define the Writer Agent
writer = Agent(
role='Expert Tech Content Strategist',
goal='Craft compelling content on AI agent technology',
backstory="""You are a renowned content strategist, known for making
complex tech topics accessible and engaging.""",
verbose=True,
allow_delegation=True
)
Now, we give each agent a clear task. Notice how task2 uses the output of task1 as its context.
(Code Snippet: Defining CrewAI Tasks)
from crewai import Task
# Research Task
task1 = Task(
description="""Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the latest advancements
in AI agents for 2025. Identify key trends, major players,
and emerging use cases.""",
expected_output="A full analysis report with bullet points.",
agent=researcher
)
# Writing Task
task2 = Task(
description="""Using the research analysis, write a compelling blog post
that highlights the most significant AI agent trends.
Your post should be informative yet accessible to a tech-savvy audience.
Make it sound cool and futuristic.""",
expected_output="A 4-paragraph blog post on the latest AI agent trends.",
agent=writer
)
Finally, we put our agents and tasks together in a Crew and set them to work in a sequential process.
(Code Snippet: Running the Crew)
from crewai import Crew, Process
# Instantiate your crew with a sequential process
market_research_crew = Crew(
agents=[researcher, writer],
tasks=[task1, task2],
verbose=2,
process=Process.sequential
)
# Get your crew to work!
result = market_research_crew.kickoff()
print(result)
AutoGen, a framework from Microsoft Research, shines in scenarios where the solution isn't straightforward. It creates agents that solve problems through dynamic, back-and-forth conversation, like a team of experts in a brainstorming session.
Let's build a two-agent team that can write and execute Python code to solve a problem.
We need an AssistantAgent
to write the code and a UserProxyAgent
that acts on our behalf to request the code, execute it, and report the results.
(Code Snippet: Configuring AutoGen Agents)
import autogen
config_list = autogen.config_list_from_json(
"OAI_CONFIG_LIST",
filter_dict={"model": ["gpt-4"]},
)
# Create the Assistant Agent (the Coder)
assistant = autogen.AssistantAgent(
name="Assistant",
llm_config={"config_list": config_list}
)
# Create the User Proxy Agent (the Executor)
user_proxy = autogen.UserProxyAgent(
name="user_proxy",
human_input_mode="NEVER",
max_consecutive_auto_reply=10,
is_termination_msg=lambda x: x.get("content", "").rstrip().endswith("TERMINATE"),
code_execution_config={"work_dir": "coding"},
)
Now, the user proxy initiates the chat with a clear task. The agents will then "talk" to each other until a solution is found and executed.
(Code Snippet: Initiating AutoGen Chat)
# Start the conversation
user_proxy.initiate_chat(
assistant,
message="""What is the current date? Compare the
stock price change of NVIDIA (NVDA) and Tesla (TSLA) today."""
)
In the output, you'll see a fascinating back-and-forth where the assistant writes Python code to fetch the stock data, and the user proxy executes it, sometimes reporting errors that the assistant then debugs and rewrites.
Now that you've seen both in action, let's break down the key differences. This aligns with what many experienced developers have concluded: "Use CrewAI if you know how to solve a problem and want to automate the process. Use AutoGen if you want a set of experts to figure out a solution for you."
Feature | CrewAI | AutoGen |
---|---|---|
Core Paradigm | Hierarchical & Process-Oriented: Like an assembly line with defined roles. | Conversational & Collaborative: Like a roundtable discussion or brainstorming session. |
Ease of Use | More intuitive and beginner-friendly due to its high-level abstractions and structured approach. | Steeper learning curve but offers greater flexibility once mastered. |
Code Execution | Relies on LangChain tools for execution; cannot natively execute and debug code itself. | Robust native code execution within secure Docker containers. Can write, execute, debug, and retry. |
Workflow Structure | Excels at sequential or hierarchical workflows where the process is known in advance. | Better for dynamic, non-linear problem-solving where the path to a solution emerges through dialogue. |
Best For... | Automating structured business processes, content creation pipelines, and routine tasks. | Complex problem-solving, research, software development, and tasks requiring iterative refinement. |
Expert Takeaway: As Augustas Pelakauskas, an AI Frameworks Specialist at Oxylabs, notes, "CrewAI works best for tasks with defined outputs. AutoGen is better when you’re solving open-ended problems that need real-time adaptation."
A major trend in 2025 is the ability to run AI agents with local Large Language Models (LLMs) instead of relying solely on cloud providers like OpenAI. Both CrewAI and AutoGen have increasing support for local models (e.g., via Ollama). This is a game-changer for businesses concerned with:
The choice between CrewAI and AutoGen isn't about which is "better," but which is the right tool for your specific job.
The most powerful realization is that they aren't mutually exclusive. Advanced systems can leverage both: using a CrewAI process to handle a structured part of a workflow, which can then trigger an AutoGen "discussion" to solve a more complex, ad-hoc problem.
You've now taken the first step from theory to practice. You've seen how to assemble and command your first autonomous AI teams.
The agents you can build with these frameworks are just the beginning. To discover the most innovative, ready-made agents being built by the community, explore the ai agents directory.